60 | 0 | 11 |
下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
为探究汕头地区软黏土在经基坑开挖卸荷作用下的强度特征,利用应力路径三轴仪模拟原状软黏土在常规固结、超固结和卸荷路径下的力学响应规律.结果表明,汕头软粘土在不同固结压力下均出现应变软化现象,在低固结压力下,应变软化程度并不明显,在高固结压力条件下,应变软化现象明显,高固结压力会破坏土粒之间的胶结作用,从而导致应变软化程度增大.在不同固结压力下的应力-应变曲线规律相似,当轴向应变处于0~5%时,偏应力似线性增长;当轴向应变达到5%左右时,偏应力增长速率减小,且出现应力峰值所对应的轴向应变均处于8%~10%.基于上述结果,可为确定该地区软土峰值强度所对应的临界应变提供依据,从而更好地指导实际工程.
Abstract:In order to explore the complex stress path of soft clay during foundation pit excavation in Shantou area, which leads to the difference of its strength characteristics, the mechanical properties and strength characteristics of the original soft clay were analyzed by triaxial compression unloading tests under different consolidation pressures. The results show that the strain softening of Shantou soft clay occurs under different consolidation pressures. At low consolidation pressure, the strain softening is not obvious, but at high consolidation pressure,the strain softening is obvious, and high consolidation pressure will destroy the cementation between soil particles, resulting in an increase in strain softening degree. The stress-strain curve is similar under different consolidation pressures. When the axial strain is 0 ~5%, the partial stress seems to increase linearly. When the axial strain reaches about 5%, the growth rate of deviatory stress decreases, and the axial strain corresponding to the peak stress is 8% ~10%.This can provide a basis for determining the critical strain corresponding to the peak strength of soft clay in the zone and guide practical engineering better.
[1]陈立国,吴昊天,陈晓斌,等.洞庭湖冲湖积软土次固结效应研究[J].应用力学学报,2020,37(6):2362-2369+2692-2693.
[2] LAMBE T W. Stress path method[J]. Journal of the Soil Mechanics and Foundation Division,1967,93(SM6):309-331.
[3] CALLISTO L,CALABRESI G. Mechanical behaviour of a natural softclay[J]. Geotechnique,1998,48(4):495-513.
[4] LAMBE T W, MARR W A. Stress path method[A]. Second Edition Journal of the Geotechnical Engineering Division,ASCE,1979(GT6):73-81.
[5]孙岳崧,濮家骝,李广信.不同应力路径对砂土应力-应变关系的影响[J].岩土工程学报,1987,9(6):78-88.
[6] MALANRAKI V,TOLL D G. Triaxial tests on weakly bonded soil with changes in stress path[J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering,2001,127(3):282-291.
[7] CALLISTO L,RAMPELLO S. Shear strength and small-strain stiffness of a natural clayundergeneral stress conditions[J]. Geotechnique,2002,52(8):547-560.
[8]何世秀,韩高升,庄心善,等.基坑开挖卸荷土体变形的试验研究[J].岩土力学,2003(1):17-20.
[9] LIU E,WANG S,ZHOU C, et al. Mechanical properties of artificial structured soils under a conventional drained loading-unloading-reloading stress path[J]. International Journal of Civil Engineering,2018,16(4):383-393.
[10]孔令伟,臧濛,郭爱国,等.湛江强结构性黏土强度特性的应力路径效应[J].岩土力学,2015,36(S1):19-24.
[11] ZHU J G,YIN J H. Strain-rate-dependent stress-strain behavior of overconsolidated Hong Kong marine clay[J]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal,2000,37(6):1272-1282.
[12]高彬,陈筠,杨恒,等.红黏土在不同应力路径下的力学特性试验研究[J].地下空间与工程学报,2018,14(5):1202-1212.
[13]杨爱武,雷博.剪切速率对结构性吹填软土力学特性影响试验研究[J].工程地质学报,2015,23(1):7-12.
[14]蒋明镜,彭立才,朱合华,等.珠海海积软土剪切带微观结构试验研究[J].岩土力学,2010,31(7):2017-2023+2029.
[15]蒋明镜,沈珠江.结构性粘土剪切带的微观分析[J].岩土工程学报,1998,20(2):102-108.
[16]黄茂松,王卫东,郑刚.软土地下工程与深基坑研究进展[J].土木工程学报,2012,45(6):146-161.
基本信息:
DOI:
中图分类号:TU447
引用信息:
[1]刘智军,杨永雨,王振等.汕头软黏土在不同应力路径下的强度试验研究[J].汕头大学学报(自然科学版),2025,40(01):64-71.
基金信息:
汕头大学科研启动基金(NTF21017)