nav emailalert searchbtn searchbox tablepage yinyongbenwen piczone journalimg journalInfo journalinfonormal searchdiv searchzone qikanlogo popupnotification paper paperNew
2025, 04, v.40 28-37
基于改进BiLSTM算法的土建滑坡隐患识别研究
基金项目(Foundation): 安徽省高等学校自然科学项目(2022AH052070);安徽省高等学校自然科学项目(2023AH051428);安徽省高等学校自然科学项目(2022AH052072)
邮箱(Email):
DOI:
摘要:

滑坡的发生受到自然、人为等多种因素的影响,使得滑坡隐患具有动态性,其识别和预测较为复杂困难.为了能够提高土建工程的安全性和稳定性,研究提出了基于改进双向长短期记忆网络算法的滑坡隐患识别方法.结果显示,研究模型的测试准确度随着迭代次数的增加而增加,在迭代次数为600左右达到0.98以上的准确度,而传统滑坡隐患识别评价模型在迭代次数为1650左右收敛,且准确度低于研究模型,为0.90左右.传统滑坡隐患识别评价模型的训练损失和测试损失分别为0.20和0.18,均大于研究模型的0.15和0.16.研究模型对研究区域不同乡镇的滑坡易发性进行评价,其中相比于其他乡镇,乡镇B、C的滑坡易发性小的区域更多,乡镇E、F、G的易发性较高的滑坡区域较多.可见通过识别并治理潜在的滑坡隐患,为避免因滑坡灾害导致的土地退化、生态破坏等问题提供参考,从而促进资源的合理利用和环境的可持续发展.

Abstract:

The occurrence of landslides is influenced by various factors such as nature and human activities, making landslide hazards dynamic and difficult to identify and predict. In order to improve the safety and stability of civil engineering, a landslide hazard identification method based on an improved bidirectional long short-term memory network algorithm is proposed. The results showed that the testing accuracy of the research model increased with the increase of iteration times, reaching an accuracy of 0.98 or above at around 600 iterations, while the traditional landslide hazard identification and evaluation model converged at around 1 650 iterations and had a lower accuracy than the research model, at around 0.90. The training loss and testing loss of the traditional landslide hazard identification and evaluation model are 0.20 and 0.18, respectively, both greater than the 0.15 and 0.16 of the research model. The research model evaluates the landslide susceptibility of different townships in the study area. Compared with other townships, townships B and C have more areas with lower landslide susceptibility, while townships E, F, and G have more areas with higher landslide susceptibility. It can be seen that by identifying and addressing potential landslide hazards. Reference can be provided to avoid land degradation, ecological damage, and other issues caused by landslide disasters, thereby promoting the rational use of resources and sustainable development of environment.

参考文献

[1]张雪,魏云杰,杨成生,等.云南昭通地区滑坡隐患InSAR广域识别与监测[J].地球科学与环境学报,2025,47(1):128-142.

[2]孙永彬,张恩,李启亮,等.金沙江下游永善段隐蔽性滑坡隐患综合遥感识别[J].工程科学与技术,2023,55(1):171-183.

[3]陈宏,江峻毅,纪成亮,等.基于SBAS-InSAR技术的高山峡谷区滑坡隐患早期识别[J].安全与环境工程,2024,31(3):206-216.

[4]董继红,张肃,梁京涛,等.利用Stacking/SBAS技术在滇西北地区滑坡隐患的识别对比[J].山东科技大学学报(自然科学版),2023,42(4):21-31.

[5]李宗仁,沙永莲,辛荣芳,等.基于时序InSAR的青海同仁市滑坡隐患早期识别与特征解析[J].科学技术与工程,2023,23(35):15158-15170.

[6]付豪,李为乐,陆会燕,等.基于“三查”体系的丹巴县滑坡隐患早期识别与监测[J].武汉大学学报(信息科学版),2024,49(5):734-746.

[7]包馨,张瑞,刘安梦云,等.联合升降轨时序InSAR的金沙江滑坡群隐患识别[J].北京理工大学学报,2023,43(11):1135-1145.

[8] SARANYA K , KARTHIKEYAN U , KUMAR A S , et al. DenseNe t-ABiLSTM:revolutionizing multiclass arrhythmia detection and classification using hybrid deep learning approach leveraging PPG signals[J]. International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems,2025,18(1):1-19.

[9]唐光民,戴可人,卓冠晨,等.基于InSAR相位梯度叠加的毛尔盖库岸滑坡隐患快速识别[J].地震工程学报,2023,45(5):1096-1105.

[10] ZHANG L, ZENG T , WANG L, et al. Advancing seismic landslide susceptibility modeling:a comparative evaluation of deep learning models through particle swarm optimization[J]. Earth Science Informatics,2024,17(4):3547-3566.

[11]韩静,杨帅,杨涛,等.基于L波段差分干涉SAR卫星的安康地区滑坡隐患识别[J].自然资源遥感,2024,36(4):254-259.

[12]张春宇,郭际明,王鼎,等.基于Stacking-InSAR的澜沧江营盘镇—苗尾段滑坡隐患识别[J].地理空间信息,2023,21(9):93-97.

[13]危洪波,龚珺,夏元平,等.融合多源遥感的滑坡隐患识别及形变监测[J].东华理工大学学报(自然科学版),2024,47(3):286-293.

[14]蔡建澳,明冬萍,赵文祎,等.基于综合遥感的察隅县滑坡隐患识别及致灾机理分析[J].自然资源遥感,2024,36(1):128-136.

[15]吴明堂,房云峰,沈月,等.基于短基线DInSAR的白鹤滩库区蓄水期滑坡隐患广域快速动态识别[J].遥感技术与应用,2023,38(5):1054-1061.

基本信息:

中图分类号:TP183;P642.22

引用信息:

[1]吕继娟,李晓明,李甲宝.基于改进BiLSTM算法的土建滑坡隐患识别研究[J].汕头大学学报(自然科学版),2025,40(04):28-37.

基金信息:

安徽省高等学校自然科学项目(2022AH052070);安徽省高等学校自然科学项目(2023AH051428);安徽省高等学校自然科学项目(2022AH052072)

检 索 高级检索

引用

GB/T 7714-2015 格式引文
MLA格式引文
APA格式引文